ו הכל מטמאין בטמא מת לאתויי מאי לאתויי קטן סלקא דעתך אמינא (במדבר יט, כ) איש אשר יטמא ולא יתחטא איש אין קטן לא קמ"ל (במדבר יט, יח) ועל הנפשות אשר היו שם
6 that means only a man but not a minor, therefore we are taught [that a minor, too, is defiled when leprous]. But say perhaps: Thus, indeed?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the laws of leprosy do not apply to a minor, in accord with the exclusive meaning of 'man'?');"><sup>15</sup></span> - [The text reads:] When adam [a man] shall have in the skin of his flesh,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XIII, 2.');"><sup>16</sup></span> i.e., as long as it is [an adam].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' 'Adam', a human being in the general sense of the term, includes minors. 'Ish' - 'man' should have been used if minors were to be excluded from the application of that law.');"><sup>17</sup></span> Then why the word 'man'? - This is in accord with what was taught: '[A leprous] man', thence I derive only the law as referring to a man, whence am I to infer it for woman?