Bekhorot 27
<big><strong>מתני׳</strong></big> כל הקדשים שקדם מום קבוע להקדשן ונפדו חייבין בבכורה ובמתנות ויוצאין לחולין ליגזז וליעבד ולדן וחלבן מותר לאחר פדיונן והשוחטן בחוץ פטור ואין עושין תמורה ואם מתו יפדו חוץ מן הבכור ומן המעשר
<big><b>MISHNAH: </b></big>ALL DEDICATED SACRIFICES WHICH HAD A PERMANENT BLEMISH BEFORE THEIR DEDICATION<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And the object of the dedication, since they possessed already a permanent blemish, was to sell them and purchase with the money sacrifices for the altar.');"><sup>1</sup></span>
וכל שקדם הקדשן את מומן או מום עובר להקדשן ולאחר מכאן נולד להן מום קבוע להקדשן ונפדו פטורין מן הבכורה ומן המתנות ואינן יוצאין לחולין ליגזז וליעבד ולדן וחלבן אסור לאחר פדיונן והשוחטן בחוץ חייב ועושין תמורה ואם מתו יקברו:
AND WERE REDEEMED, ARE LIABLE [TO THE LAW] OF THE FIRSTLING AND THE [PRIESTLY] GIFTS;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The shoulder, jaw and maw, as is the case with genuine hullin (unconsecrated animals) .');"><sup>2</sup></span>
<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> טעמא דנפדו הא לא נפדו פטורין מן הבכורה ומן המתנות
THEY BECOME UNCONSECRATED ANIMALS AS REGARDS SHEARING AND WORKING;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For they are considered hullin, as they were blemished before dedication, and the law of dedicated sacrifices which had become unfit for the altar, where shearing and working are prohibited, does not apply to them.');"><sup>3</sup></span>
קסבר
THEIR OFFSPRING AND MILK ARE PERMITTED TO BE USED AFTER THEIR REDEMPTION;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even if they were pregnant before their redemption, for since they gave birth after their redemption. their offspring are permitted. V. GEMARA:');"><sup>4</sup></span>
קדושת דמים מדחה מן הבכורה ומן המתנות:
HE WHO SLAUGHTERS THEM WITHOUT<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even before their redemption. since the animals did not receive any sanctity from the outset, owing to their blemishes before dedication.');"><sup>5</sup></span>
מסייע ליה לרבי אליעזר דאמר
THEY MAY BE REDEEMED,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In order to give the carcases to dogs to eat. Moreover, we are taught here also that they hold an inferior status compared with other dedicated sacrifices, which can only be redeemed when alive.');"><sup>7</sup></span>
קדשי בדק הבית אסורין בגיזה ועבודה
EXCEPT IN THE CASE OF A FIRSTLING AND AN ANIMAL SET ASIDE FOR TITHE [OF CATTLE].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A firstling, even with a permanent blemish. is sanctified as the passing through the womb consecrates it. And with reference also to tithing. Scripture ordains that whether it be good, i.e., without a blemish, or bad (blemished) , the animal passes under the rod to be tithed.');"><sup>8</sup></span>
אמרי
ALL ANIMALS HOWEVER WHICH WERE DEDICATED BEFORE THEY BECAME BLEMISHED OR HAD ONLY SUFFERED A TRANSITORY BLEMISH BEFORE THEIR DEDICATION AND AFTER THAT DEVELOPED A PERMANENT BLEMISH, AND WERE REDEEMED, ARE EXEMPT [FROM THE LAW] OF THE FIRSTLING AND FROM THE [PRIESTLY] GIFTS; THEY DO NOT BECOME UNCONSECRATED AS REGARDS SHEARING AND WORKING; THEIR OFFSPRING AND MILK ARE FORBIDDEN TO BE USED AFTER THEIR REDEMPTION; HE WHO SLAUGHTERS THEM WITHOUT [THE TEMPLE COURT] IS PUNISHABLE [WITH EXCISION]; THE LAW OF SUBSTITUTE APPLIES TO THEM; AND IF THEY DIE, THEY ARE TO BE BURIED.
לא קדושת דמים למזבח הוא דמיחלפא בקדושת הגוף למזבח גזרו בהו רבנן אבל קדשי בדק הבית לא:
<big><b>GEMARA: </b></big>The reason<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Why the first clause of the Mishnah says that they are liable to the law of the firstling.');"><sup>9</sup></span>
ולדן וחלבן מותר כו':
is because they were redeemed, but if they were not redeemed, they would have been exempt from [the law of] the firstling and from the [priestly] gifts, for [the Mishnah] holds that the consecration of an object consecrated for its value sets aside [the law of] the firstling and the duty of the [priestly] gifts.
אלא דאיעבר לפני פדיונן ואתיליד לאחר פדיונן
This would confirm the opinion of R'Eleazar who said: Animals dedicated for keeping the Temple in repair,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The dedicated animals are sold and the money is devoted to the repair of the Sanctuary.');"><sup>11</sup></span>
הא לפני פדיונן אסירי
are forbidden as regards shearing and working! - [No]. It can he maintained that this is no proof. For an object consecrated for its value, eventually to be used for the altar,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The money realized from its sale is used to purchase sacrifices for the altar, and we therefore prohibit its shearing and working.');"><sup>12</sup></span> might be confused with an object which is itself consecrated for the altar, therefore the Rabbis enacted a prohibition.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because if in the former case we permit the shearing and working, we might be led to permit in the latter case.');"><sup>13</sup></span> But in the case of an object dedicated for keeping the Temple in repair, the Rabbis did not enact a prohibition.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For there is little fear here that because in the one case we permit the shearing and working. we might be led to permit in connection with the object consecrated as such, as there is an obvious distinction between the two.');"><sup>14</sup></span> THEIR OFFSPRING AND MILK ARE PERMITTED etc. How is this to be understood? Shall I say that [we speak of where] they became pregnant and gave birth after their redemption? Surely this is obvious? They are unconsecrated animals! Rather what is meant is that they were pregnant before their redemption and gave birth after their redemption. This implies that before their redemption, [the offspring] are forbidden!?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To be used for any purpose without redemption, nor could they be offered up on the altar, since even their own mother is not fit for the altar.');"><sup>15</sup></span>