Bekhorot 60
אינו נחשד אלא לאותו דבר בלבד
who accepted the obligations of a haber<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A member of an order who were very scrupulous in the observance of the levitical laws in daily intercourse; v. Glos.');"><sup>2</sup></span>
ת"ר
And a proselyte, who accepted the teachings of the Torah, though he is suspected of ignoring only one religious law, is suspected of disregarding the whole Torah,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sh. Mek. adds, Or even if he is suspected of ignoring the whole Torah.');"><sup>3</sup></span>
הבא לקבל דברי חבירות חוץ מדבר אחד אין מקבלין אותו
and he is considered as a non-observant Israelite.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And we do not maintain that he is considered as a real heathen, as if he had not become a proselyte.');"><sup>4</sup></span>
ואם לאו מלמדין אותו ואחר כך מקבלין אותו
If a priest was prepared to accept the duties of the priesthood except one religious law, we must not receive him [as a priest], as it is said, He [among the sons of Aaron] that offereth the blood etc. ,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The verse continues: Of the peace-offering and the fat, shall have the right thigh for a portion (Lev. VII, 33) , thus teaching that the priest must practise all the laws devolving upon the sons of Aaron, and then only he is entitled to his dues.');"><sup>7</sup></span>
בין כך ובין כך מקבלין אותו והוא למד כדרכו והולך:
Our Rabbis taught: If one applies to become a haber, if we saw him practising these privately at his house,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Prior to agreeing to observe them publicly so that he cannot be accused of doing so merely for show.');"><sup>8</sup></span>
קיבל לטהרות ולא קיבל לכנפים אף לטהרות לא קיבל:
Our Rabbis taught: We accept a haber if he promises to observe cleanness of hands<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Washing the hands before eating and before touching food of terumah.');"><sup>9</sup></span>
בית שמאי אומרים
If, however, he promised to observe the rules of levitical purity but not cleanness of hands, then even his promise to observe the rules of levitical purity is not regarded as a genuine promise.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For, if he will not undertake to keep a simple matter like the washing of hands, then we can have no confidence in his promise to observe other levitical restrictions.');"><sup>11</sup></span>
אחד זה ואחד זה לשנים עשר חודש
Beth Shammai say: As regards [the purity of his] liquids, [whose uncleanness is of a light character], the period is thirty days, but as regards the purity of [his] garment,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The garment of an 'am ha-arez is considered unclean by a person observant of the rules of levitical purity, through the former leaning and pressing on it.');"><sup>13</sup></span>
אלא בית הלל אומרים
If this be so, then you have here a ruling where Beth Shammai is more lenient and Beth Hillel is the stricter?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In 'Ed. only six examples of these are quoted. This case would therefore constitute one more example.');"><sup>14</sup></span>
הבא לקבל דברי חבירות צריך לקבל בפני שלשה חבירים ובניו ובני ביתו אינן צריכין לקבל בפני שלשה חבירים
Our Rabbis taught: One who desires to accept the obligations of a haber is required to do so in the presence of three haberim, whereas his sons and the members of his family are not required to accept [these obligations] in the presence of three haberim.
רבן שמעון בן גמליאל אומר
But R'Simeon B'Gamaliel says: His sons and the members of his family are also required to accept [these obligations] in the presence of three haberim, because the case of a haber who accepts [these obligations] is not on a par with the case of the son of a haber<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The father, a haber, will be more strict, as he publicly accepted in the presence of three haberim the obligations involved, whereas the son of a haber only sees his father practise these laws. Another interpretation is as follows: The reason, according to the first Tanna quoted above, why the sons and the members of the family of a haber are not required to accept these obligations is because the family of a haber actually seeing these levitical laws observed at home, are not suspected of disregarding them and therefore there is no necessity for them to accept these obligations in the presence of three haberim.');"><sup>15</sup></span>
תנו רבנן
Our Rabbis taught: One who desires to accept the obligations of a haber is required to accept them in the presence of three haberim, and even a talmid hakam [a scholar] is required to accept the obligations in the presence of three haberim.
הבא לקבל דברי חבירות צריך לקבל בפני ג' חבירים ואפילו תלמיד חכם צריך לקבל בפני שלשה חבירים
An elder, a member of a scholars' council, is not required to accept [these obligations] in the presence of three haberim, having already accepted them from the time when he took his place at the council.
אף תלמיד חכם אינו צריך לקבל בפני שלשה חבירים ולא עוד אלא שאחרים מקבלין לפניו
Said R'Johanan: In the days of the son of R'Hanina B'Antigonus was this teaching taught.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That even a talmid hakam is required to accept the obligations of a haber in the presence of three haberim, for even he was suspected in such matters.');"><sup>16</sup></span>
אשת עם הארץ שנשאת לחבר וכן בתו של עם הארץ שנשאת לחבר וכן עבדו של עם הארץ שנמכר לחבר כולן צריכין לקבל דברי חבירות בתחלה
guarded their dignity by not entrusting matters of levitical cleanness to everybody.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It was not therefore because R. Hanina held scholars in contempt that he seated some of his disciples with the Rabbis.');"><sup>25</sup></span>
אבל אשת חבר שנשאת לעם הארץ וכן בתו של חבר שנשאת לעם הארץ וכן עבדו של חבר שנמכר לעם הארץ אין צריכין לקבל דברי חבירות בתחלה
Our Rabbis taught: [The wife of a haber is considered as a haber].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So Sh. Mek.');"><sup>26</sup></span>
מעשה באשה אחת שנשאת לחבר והיתה קומעת לו תפילין על ידו נשאת לעם הארץ והיתה קושרת לו קשרי מוכס על ידו:
Our Rabbis taught: The wife of an 'am ha-arez who was married to a haber, likewise a daughter of an 'am ha-arez who was married to a haber, and similarly the slave of an 'am ha-arez who was sold to a haber - all of these must first<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Before we can receive them as haberim.');"><sup>30</sup></span> accept the obligations of a haber.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And although it is stated above that the members of the family are not required to accept the obligations of a haber, the case is different here because when acceptance took place the wife, daughter and slave were not with him and there is, consequently, the fear that earlier habits may still influence their conduct.');"><sup>31</sup></span> But the wife of a haber who was married to an 'am ha-arez, likewise the daughter of a haber who was married to an 'am ha-arez and similarly the slave of a haber who was sold to an 'am ha-arez, need not first accept the obligations of a haber.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If they return to the sphere of the haber.');"><sup>32</sup></span> R'Simeon B'Eleazar says: Even the latter require first to accept the obligations of a haber. For R'Simeon B'Eleazar reported in the name of R'Meir: It happened with a certain woman who was married to a haber that she fastened the straps of the tefillin [phylacteries] on his hand and when afterwards married to a publican, she knotted the custom seals for him.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' We see therefore that even a wife originally of a haber can alter her habits in a changed environment and the same applies to a slave, etc.');"><sup>33</sup></span>