Chullin 155

דניכחוש חיליה

its [productive] strength be weakened,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For its excessive fertility was no doubt the cause for it casting its fruits. This is therefore not regarded as a superstitious practice.');">¹</span>

אלא סוקרו בסיקרא אמאי

but why may it be painted with red paint?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Is this not an Amorite practice?');">²</span>

כי היכי דליחזיוה אינשי וליבעי רחמי עילויה

- The purpose is that people will observe it and pray for its recovery.

כדתניא

As it was taught: [It is written:] And he shall cry: Unclean, unclean,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XIII, 45.');">³</span>

(ויקרא יג, מה) וטמא טמא יקרא צריך להודיע לרבים ורבים מבקשים עליו רחמים

that is to say, he shall make known [his affliction] to his fellow men that they may pray for him.

וכן מי שאירע בו דבר צריך להודיע לרבים ורבים מבקשים עליו רחמים

Likewise, he upon whom a calamity has befallen should make known [his trouble] to his fellow men that they may pray for him.

אמר רבינא

Rabina said: According to whom is it that we suspend a cluster [of dates] on a tree [which casts its fruit]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And we do not regard it as a superstitious practice.');">⁴</span>

כמאן תלינן כובסא בדיקלא כמאן כי האי תנא:

- It is in accordance with the above Tanna.

<br><br><big><strong>הדרן עלך בהמה המקשה</strong></big><br><br>

<big><b>MISHNAH: </b></big>[THE LAW OF] IT AND ITS YOUNG<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XXII, 28; the penalty for the infringement of this prohibition is forty stripes. Whether the prohibition applies only to the cow or ewe and her young or also to the bull or ram and his young, is a question disputed in the Gemara infra.');">⁵</span>

מתני׳ <big><strong>אותו</strong></big> ואת בנו נוהג בין בארץ בין בח"ל בפני הבית ושלא בפני הבית בחולין ובמוקדשין

IS IN FORCE BOTH WITHIN THE LAND OF ISRAEL AND OUTSIDE IT, BOTH DURING THE EXISTENCE OF THE TEMPLE AND AFTER IT, IN RESPECT OF BOTH UNCONSECRATED AND CONSECRATED ANIMALS.

כיצד

THUS, IF ONE PERSON SLAUGHTERED AN ANIMAL AND [ANOTHER]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It is assumed for the sake of clarity that one person slaughtered the dam and another the young. The law would be the same, however, if both animals were slaughtered by the same person; moreover, it is immaterial whether the dam was slaughtered first and then the young or vice versa.');">⁶</span>

השוחט אותו ואת בנו חולין בחוץ שניהם כשרים והשני סופג את הארבעים

ITS YOUNG, BOTH ANIMALS BEING UNCONSECRATED, [AND THEY SLAUGHTERED THEM] OUTSIDE THE SANCTUARY, THEY ARE BOTH VALID,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even though there has been a transgression of the prohibition.');">⁷</span>

קדשים בחוץ הראשון חייב כרת ושניהם פסולים ושניהם סופגים את הארבעים

BUT [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED] THE SECOND INCURS FORTY STRIPES.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For the infringement of the prohibition of 'It and its young'.');">⁸</span>

חולין בפנים שניהם פסולין והשני סופג את הארבעים

IF BOTH ANIMALS WERE CONSECRATED [AND THEY WERE SLAUGHTERED] OUTSIDE THE SANCTUARY, [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED] THE FIRST INCURS THE PENALTY OF KARETH,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The penalty prescribed for slaughtering a consecrated animal fit for a sacrifice outside the Temple court, V. Lev. XVII, 4. For Kareth v. Glos. He who slaughtered the second animal is not liable to this penalty for what he slaughtered, though consecrated, was not fit for a sacrifice at the time, since its dam had been slaughtered previously on the same day.');">⁹</span>

קדשים בפנים הראשון כשר ופטור והשני סופג את הארבעים ופסול

BOTH ANIMALS ARE INVALID, AND EACH INCURS FORTY STRIPES.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first for infringing, the law against slaughtering consecrated animals outside the Sanctuary; for, although it has, been said that he is liable to the penalty of Kareth, if he was warned before the commission of the act that he would be liable to the punishment of stripes, he would suffer that punishment (so according to the view of R. Akiba in Mak. 13b) ; and the second for the infringement of the prohibition of 'It and its young'.');">¹⁰</span>

חולין וקדשים בחוץ הראשון כשר ופטור והשני סופג את הארבעים ופסול

IF BOTH ANIMALS WERE UNCONSECRATED [AND THEY WERE SLAUGHTERED] INSIDE THE SANCTUARY, BOTH ANIMALS ARE INVALID,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Kid. 57b. Unconsecrated animals slaughtered inside the Sanctuary are thereby rendered invalid, but he who slaughtered them has not incurred the penalty of stripes, for the prohibition thereof is not expressly stated in the Torah, but is deduced from the verse in Deut. XII, 21.');">¹¹</span>

קדשים וחולין בחוץ הראשון חייב כרת ופסול והשני כשר ושניהם סופגים את הארבעים

AND [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED] THE SECOND INCURS FORTY STRIPES.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 433, n. 4. inz rxujn');">¹²</span>

חולין וקדשים בפנים שניהם פסולין והשני סופג את הארבעים

IF BOTH ANIMALS WERE CONSECRATED [AND THEY WERE SLAUGHTERED] INSIDE THE SANCTUARY, THE FIRST IS VALID AND [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED IT IS] NOT CULPABLE, BUT [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED] THE SECOND INCURS FORTY STRIPES,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 433, n. 4. inz rxujn');">¹²</span>

קדשים וחולין בפנים הראשון כשר ופטור והשני סופג את הארבעים ופסול

AND IT IS INVALID.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For it is this day unfit for a sacrifice and comes under the class of , lit., 'wanting in age', 'out of time', either too young or for some other reason temporarily disqualified.');">¹³</span>

חולין בחוץ ובפנים הראשון כשר ופטור והשני סופג את הארבעים ופסול

IF [THE FIRST ANIMAL WAS] UNCONSECRATED AND [THE SECOND] CONSECRATED [AND THEY WERE BOTH SLAUGHTERED] OUTSIDE THE SANCTUARY, THE FIRST IS VALID AND [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED IT IS] NOT CULPABLE, BUT [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED] THE SECOND INCURS FORTY STRIPES AND IT IS INVALID.

קדשים בחוץ ובפנים הראשון חייב כרת ושניהם סופגים את הארבעים ושניהם פסולים

IF [THE FIRST WAS] CONSECRATED AND [THE SECOND] UNCONSECRATED [AND THEY WERE BOTH SLAUGHTERED] OUTSIDE THE SANCTUARY, [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED] THE FIRST INCURS THE PENALTY OF KARETH AND IT IS INVALID, AND THE SECOND [ANIMAL] IS VALID, AND EACH INCURS FORTY STRIPES.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' v. p. 433, n. 6.');">¹⁴</span>

חולין בפנים ובחוץ הראשון פסול ופטור והשני סופג את הארבעים וכשר

IF [THE FIRST WAS] UNCONSECRATED AND [THE SECOND] CONSECRATED [AND THEY WERE BOTH SLAUGHTERED] INSIDE THE SANCTUARY, THEY ARE BOTH INVALID, AND [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED] THE SECOND INCURS FORTY STRIPES.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 433, n. 4. inz rxujn');">¹²</span>

קדשים בפנים ובחוץ הראשון כשר ופטור והשני סופג את הארבעים ופסול:

IF [THE FIRST WAS] CONSECRATED AND [THE SECOND] UNCONSECRATED [AND THEY WERE BOTH SLAUGHTERED] INSIDE THE SANCTUARY, THE FIRST ANIMAL IS VALID AND [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED IT IS] NOT CULPABLE, BUT [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED] THE SECOND INCURS FORTY STRIPES<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 433, n. 4. inz rxujn');">¹²</span>

<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> ת"ר

AND IT IS INVALID.

מנין לאותו ואת בנו שנוהג במוקדשין

IF [THE FIRST WAS SLAUGHTERED] OUTSIDE THE SANCTUARY AND [THE SECOND] INSIDE, BOTH BEING UNCONSECRATED ANIMALS, THE FIRST IS VALID AND [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED IT IS] NOT CULPABLE, BUT [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED] THE SECOND INCURS FORTY STRIPES AND IT IS INVALID.

תלמוד לומר

IF [THE FIRST WAS SLAUGHTERED] OUTSIDE THE SANCTUARY AND [THE SECOND] INSIDE, BOTH BEING CONSECRATED ANIMALS, [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED] THE FIRST INCURS THE PENALTY OF KARETH, EACH INCURS FORTY STRIPES,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 433, n. 6.');">¹⁵</span>

(ויקרא כב, כז) שור או כשב או עז כי יולד וכתיב בתריה

AND BOTH ANIMALS ARE INVALID.

(ויקרא כב, כח) ושור או שה אותו ואת בנו לא תשחטו ביום אחד לימד על אותו ואת בנו שנוהג במוקדשין

IF [THE FIRST WAS SLAUGHTERED] INSIDE THE SANCTUARY AND [THE SECOND] OUTSIDE, BOTH BEING UNCONSECRATED ANIMALS, THE FIRST IS INVALID AND [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED IT IS] NOT CULPABLE, BUT [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED] THE SECOND INCURS FORTY STRIPES<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For the infringement of the prohibition of 'It and its young'.');">¹⁶</span>

ואימא

AND IT IS VALID.

במוקדשין אין בחולין לא

IF [THE FIRST WAS SLAUGHTERED] INSIDE THE SANCTUARY AND [THE SECOND] OUTSIDE, BOTH BEING CONSECRATED ANIMALS, THE FIRST IS VALID AND [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED IT IS] NOT CULPABLE, BUT [HE WHO SLAUGHTERED] THE SECOND INCURS FORTY STRIPES<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For the infringement of the prohibition of 'It and its young'.');">¹⁶</span>

שור הפסיק הענין

AND IT IS INVALID.

ואימא

<big><b>GEMARA: </b></big>Our Rabbis taught: Whence do we know that the law of 'It and its young' applies to consecrated animals?

בחולין אין במוקדשין לא

Because the verse states: When a bullock or a sheep or a goat is brought forth.

כתיב

[thenceforth it may be accepted for an offering],<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XXII, 27. This verse obviously refers to consecrated animals.');">¹⁷</span>

ושור וי"ו מוסיף על ענין ראשון

and there immediately follows the verse: And whether it be an ox or a sheep, ye shall not kill it and its young both in one day,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ibid. 28.');">¹⁸</span>

אי מה קדשים כלאים לא אף אותו ואת בנו כלאים לא

thus indicating that the law of 'It an its young' applies to consecrated animals.

אלמה תניא

Perhaps then it applies only to consecrated animals and not to unconsecrated animals! - [This cannot be, for] the word 'ox' interrupts the subject matter.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If this law referred only to consecrated animals which is the subject matter of the preceding verse: Scripture should not have repeated the words 'ox or sheep' since these are mentioned in the preceding verse The fact that the words 'ox or sheep' are repeated indicates that the law applies generally.');">¹⁹</span>

אותו ואת בנו נוהג בכלאים ובכוי

Perhaps then it applies to unconsecrated animals only and not to consecrated animals! - Since it is written: 'And.

ועוד שה כתיב

an ox', the conjunction 'and' connects it with the previous subject.

ואמר רבא

It should then follow, should it not, that as a hybrid cannot be a consecrated animal, so the law of 'It and its young' should not apply to a hybrid? Wherefore has it been taught: The law of 'It and its young' applies to a hybrid<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The product of a ewe and a he-goat. If one slaughtered this offspring and its dam one would be culpable. huf');">²⁰</span> and to a koy?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' a permitted animal, about which the Rabbis were undecided whether it was to be classed in the category of cattle or of wild beasts. Probably a cross between a goat and some species of gazelle. V. infra ');">²¹</span> And [there is] also [this difficulty] for it is written here, sheep, and Raba has declared,