ט ואימא קלי דמייתר מחייב חדא אכולהון מחייב חדא אם כן נכתוב קרא לחם כרמל וקלי אי נמי נכתוב קלי ולחם וכרמל אמאי כתב לקלי באמצע הכי קאמר לחם בקלי נחייב וכרמל נחייב בקלי
9 which is one of the essential precepts of the Torah,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Viz., the fact that kareth is attached to it.');"><sup>13</sup></span> has only been derived through a gezerah shawah. What is [the gezerah shawah]? - The derivation of kodesh [holy] from kodesh [in the following texts]: Everyone that eateth it shall bear his iniquity, because he hath profaned the holy thing of the Lord,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XIX, 8; the penalty of kareth follows.');"><sup>14</sup></span> and Thou shalt burn the nothar with fire, [it shall not be eaten] because it is holy.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ex. XXIX, 34.');"><sup>15</sup></span> Said Abaye: Never treat a gezerah shawah lightly, for behold the law concerning a man's daughter from an outraged woman is one of the essential precepts<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Viz., that this form of incest is subject to death by burning.');"><sup>16</sup></span> of the Torah, and yet it has been derived only through a gezerah shawah,' as Raba said: R'Isaac son of Abdimi told me: As to the prohibition, this law is derived from the similarity of the expression hennah,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'they are', an expression used twice in connection with incest; firstly in Lev. XVIII, 17 dealing with the prohibition of intercourse with a woman and her daughter, both married unto him or not; and then in v. 10 relating to the prohibition of intercourse with one's grand-daughter. The latter text is interpreted in Yeb. ');"><sup>17</sup></span> and with regard to the penalty of burning from the similarity of the expression zimmah.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'lewdness', mentioned in Lev. XVIII, 17 and XX, 14 where the prescribed penalty is burning, v. Sanh. 51a.');"><sup>18</sup></span>