ג והא דתנן חבורה שאבד פסחה ואמרו לאחד צא ובקש ושחוט עלינו והלך ומצא ושחט והן לקחו ושחטו אם שלו נשחט ראשון הוא אוכל משלו והם אוכלים ושותים עמו
3 But let Scripture write [it] in respect to terumah, and these [marriage and divorce] would come and be derived from it? - Because one can refute [the analogy], since it is possible by [mere] intention.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A person may decide to separate a part of his grain (e.g., that in the right or left corner) as terumah and then eat the rest. This is obviously a leniency, and it may be argued that that is why one can also appoint an agent.');"><sup>7</sup></span> Again, as to what we learnt: If a company lose their Paschal sacrifice<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The passover sacrifice was eaten by a group of people who had joined and arranged beforehand to eat a particular animal: unless one had thus 'counted himself in' before it was killed he could not eat thereof.');"><sup>8</sup></span> and instruct one [of their number], 'Go out, seek it, and slaughter it on our behalf; and he goes, finds, and slaughters it, while they [also] take [an animal] and slaughter [it]: if his is slaughtered first, he eats of his, and they eat<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cur. ed.: eat and drink, but Wilna Gaon deletes 'and drink'.');"><sup>9</sup></span>