Zevachim 85
ומנחת כהנים ומנחת כהן משיח והדם והנסכים הבאין בפני עצמן דברי רבי מאיר וחכמים אומרים אף הבאין עם הבהמה
<br> THE PRIESTS' MEAL-OFFERING, THE ANOINTED PRIEST'S MEAL-OFFERING, THE BLOOD, AND THE DRINK-OFFERINGS THAT ARE BROUGHT SEPARATELY: THAT IS THE VIEW OF R. MEIR. THE SAGES MAINTAIN: ALSO THOSE THAT ARE BROUGHT WITH AN ANIMAL [SACRIFICE]. A LEPERS LOG OF OIL, R. SIMEON MAINTAINED, DOES NOT INVOLVE LIABILITY ON ACCOUNT OF PIGGUL; WHILE R. MEIR RULES: IT INVOLVES LIABILITY ON ACCOUNT OF PIGGUL, BECAUSE THE BLOOD OF THE
לוג שמן של מצורע ר' שמעון אומר אין חייבין עליו משום פיגול ורבי מאיר אומר חייבין עליו משום פיגול שדם האשם מתירו וכל שיש לו מתירין בין לאדם בין למזבח חייבין עליו משום פיגול
GUILT-OFFERING MAKES IT PERMITTED. AND WHATEVER HAS AUGHT THAT MAKES IT PERMITTED, WHETHER FOR MAN OR FOR THE ALTAR, INVOLVES LIABILITY ON ACCOUNT OF PIGGUL. [THE SPRINKLING OF] THE BLOOD OF THE BURNT-OFFERING PERMITS ITS FLESH FOR [BURNING ON] THE ALTAR, AND ITS SKIN TO THE PRIESTS. THE BLOOD OF THE BURNT-OFFERING OF A BIRD PERMITS ITS FLESH TO THE ALTAR. THE BLOOD OF THE SIN-OFFERING OF A BIRD PERMITS ITS FLESH TO THE PRIESTS. THE BLOOD OF THE BULLOCKS THAT ARE BURNT AND THE GOATS THAT ARE BURNT PERMITS THEIR EMURIM TO BE OFFERED [ON THE ALTAR]. R. SIMEON SAID: WHATEVER IS NOT [SPRINKLED] ON THE OUTER ALTAR, AS THE PEACE-OFFERING, DOES NOT INVOLVE LIABILITY ON ACCOUNT OF PIGGUL.
העולה דמה מתיר את בשרה למזבח ועורה לכהנים עולת העוף דמה מתיר את בשרה למזבח חטאת העוף דמה מתיר את בשרה לכהנים פרים הנשרפים ושעירים הנשרפים דמן מתיר את אימוריהן ליקרב
GEMARA. 'Ulla said: If the fistful [of the meal-offering], which is piggul, is presented on the altar, its piggul status leaves it: seeing that it reduces others to [the state of] piggul, how much the more so itself. What does he mean? - This is what he means: if it is unacceptable, how can it reduce others to [the state of] piggul? <br>
ר' שמעון אומר כל שאינו על המזבח החיצון כשלמים אין חייבין עליו משום פיגול:
What does he inform us? If that it does not involve liability for piggul, Surely we have learnt it: THESE ARE THE THINGS FOR WHICH ONE IS NOT LIABLE ON ACCOUNT OF PIGGUL: THE FISTFUL, THE INCENSE, THE FRANKINCENSE, THE PRIESTS MEAL-OFFERING, THE ANOINTED PRIEST'S MEAL-OFFERING, AND THE BLOOD? - Rather, [he informs us] that if it ascended [the altar], it does not descend. But we have learnt it: [Flesh] that is kept overnight, or that goes out [of its permitted boundaries], or which is unclean, or which was slaughtered [with the intention of being consumed] after time or without bounds, if it ascended [the altar], does not descend? - Rather, [he informs us] that if it was taken down [from the altar], it must be taken up [again]. But surely we have learnt: Just as it does not descend once it had ascended, so it does not ascend after having descended! - That [Ulla's teaching] is only when the fire [of the altar] has taken hold of it. But this too 'Ulla has already stated once? For 'Ulla said: They learnt this only where the fire had not taken hold of it; but if the fire had taken hold of it, it must go up [again]! - You might think that this holds good only of