פירוש על קידושין 35:13

Rava assumes that when the mishnah teaches that he may redeem her against “his will”—“his” means the master. Abbaye reads this to mean that if she does not have the money to redeem herself, we can write an IOU document for her value and give it to her owner and force her to be freed. But why should we have this right? The master currently now owns a “pearl”—the slave. Why should we be able to force him to take a worthless shard (the document)?