Commentary for Chullin 110:10
מתקיף לה ר' תנחומא
And indeed, take the case of clear water which [if found] in either organ is not a defect.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This question is unintelligible, and Rashi is at a loss to explain it. The fact that this is clearly implied in the second ruling which followed as a matter of course makes this statement meaningless; but v. Tosaf a.I. It seems that the entire passage is corrupt. R. Gershom comments upon this line, but on the other hand does not seem to have had the second ruling in his text. A very likely original text is to be found in the Alfasi on this passage, q.v.');"><sup>2</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Chullin 110:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.