Commentary for Kiddushin 105:1
נמנו וגמרו המקדש בחלקו בין קדשי קדשים ובין קדשים קלים לא קידש ורב אמר עדיין היא מחלוקת אמר אביי כוותיה דר' יוחנן מסתברא
A vote was taken [among scholars] and it was resolved: He who betroths with his portion, whether of the higher or of the lower sanctity, has not betrothed. But Rab maintained: The dispute continues.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' There was no vote on the matter, in which case R. Judah would have revoked his ruling.');"><sup>1</sup></span> Said Abaye: Reason supports R'Johanan.
Daf Shevui to Kiddushin
So now we have a dispute about whether there is a dispute. Those rabbis sure love their disputes!
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Daf Shevui to Kiddushin
Abaye is now going to quote a long baraita that in its totality supports R. Yohanan. The details of this baraita are not relevant for our sugya, but I will still, of course, explain them briefly. The main message of the baraita is that the priests may not exchange one sacrificial gift (meat, fowl or meal-offering) for another.
Priests who receive meal-offerings as part of their portions may not demand to exchange them for sacrificial meat.
Priests who receive meal-offerings as part of their portions may not demand to exchange them for sacrificial meat.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy