Commentary for Kiddushin 113:9
איתיביה שחטה ונמצאת טריפה יקח זוג לשניה והראשונה מותרת בהנאה ואי ס"ד מחיים אסורה הראשונה אמאי מותרת בהנאה א"ל הכא במאי עסקינן כגון שנמצאת טריפה בבני מעיה דלא חל עלה קדושה כלל
R'Johanan raised an objection to Resh Lakish: Of all clean birds ye may eat:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Deut. XIV, 11.');"><sup>22</sup></span> this includes the bird that i set free.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' 'All' is an extension.');"><sup>23</sup></span> But these are they of which ye shall not eat:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ibid. 12.');"><sup>24</sup></span>
Daf Shevui to Kiddushin
Resh Lakish explains that the baraita refers to a case where the bird was found to be flawed inside. This means that the bird was never holy and therefore it can be used after.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Daf Shevui to Kiddushin
With the bird sacrifice, one must bring hyssop, cedar wood and scarlet thread. If one slaughtered the bird without these things, the rabbis disagree with regard to whether the slaughtering is considered slaughtering such that one may not derive benefit from the bird. But what is clear is that both R. Ya’akov and R. Shimon agree that the bird is not prohibited until it is slaughtered.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy