Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Shabbat 43:1

נר של חנוכה שהניחה למעלה מכ' אמה פסולה כסוכה וכמבוי: ואמר רב כהנא דרש רב נתן בר מניומי משמיה דרב תנחום מאי דכתיב (בראשית לז, כד) והבור רק אין בו מים ממשמע שנא' והבור רק איני יודע שאין בו מים אלא מה ת"ל אין בו מים מים אין בו אבל נחשים ועקרבים יש בו:

If a Hanukkah lamp is placed above twenty cubits [from the ground] it is unfit, like <i>sukkah</i> and a cross-beam over [the entrance of] an alley.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A sukkah (q.v. Glos.) built higher than twenty cubits, or a cross-beam which permits carrying in a side street (v. p. 30, n. 5 and 'Er. 2a) placed higher than twenty cubits from the ground, is unfit. Similarly a Hanukkah lamp, because it is too high to be noticed and does not advertise the miracle. ');"><sup>1</sup></span> R. Kahana also said, R. Nathan b. Minyomi expounded in R. Tanhum's name: Why is it written, and the pit was empty, there was no water in it?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Gen. XXXVII, 24. ');"><sup>2</sup></span> From the implication of what is said, 'and the pit was empty', do I not know that there was no water in it; what then is taught by, 'there was no water in it'? There was no water, yet there were snakes and scorpions in it. Rabbah said: The Hanukkah lamp should be placed within the handbreadth nearest the door.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On the outside, as stated on 21b. But if it is placed further away, there is nothing to show that it was set there by the owner of the house. ');"><sup>3</sup></span>

Rashi on Shabbat

Invalid: Since the eye will not master (notice) [things] above twenty cubits, and there will be no publication of the miracle.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Tosafot on Shabbat

A Hanukkah lamp that one placed above twenty cubits is invalid, just as a sukkah and as an alleyway: But perhaps you will say, "It should have said, 'Reduce [the height of] it,' like regarding the alleyway. Since there (Eruvin 2a), it said, 'an alleyway is rabbinic - [that is why] they taught the rectification.'" But it can be said (answered) that it mentioned, "invalid," because it needed to say, "just as a sukkah," which is from the Torah. Or also (another explanation) is that it did not want to speak at length: "Extinguish it, reduce [the height of] it and light it." As to reduce it and leave it as it is, would not be possible - as is shown later (Shabbat 23a).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rashi on Shabbat

Sukkah and alleyway: Since we learned (in the Mishnah) explicitly in Eruvin and in Tractate Sukkah, that they are invalid.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Full ChapterNext Verse