Commentary for Yevamot 106:8

מתני׳ <big><strong>הבא</strong></big> על יבמתו בין בשוגג בין במזיד בין באונס בין ברצון אפי' הוא שוגג והיא מזידה הוא מזיד והיא שוגגת הוא אנוס והיא לא אנוסה היא אנוסה והוא לא אנוס אחד המערה ואחד הגומר קנה ולא חילק בין ביאה לביאה

And as to your possible objection that provision should be made where cohabitation followed a letter of divorce as a preventive measure against cohabitation that followed a <i>halizah</i>,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Were the former to be regarded as valid the latter also might be so regarded. ');">¹⁹</span> [it may be replied that] as <i>halizah</i> is a Pentateuchal law it is well known.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And no one would draw comparisons between the two. ');">²⁰</span> And as to your objection that provision should be made where cohabitation followed a ma'amar as a preventive measure against cohabitation that followed another cohabitation, [it may also be replied that] as <i>kinyan</i> by cohabitation is a Pentateuchal law it is certainly well known.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And no one would draw comparisons between the two. ');">²⁰</span>

Explore commentary for Yevamot 106:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.