Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Halakhah for Eruvin 10:9

רב אשי אמר אפילו תימא במבוי שמונה נמי לא צריך לחי מה נפשך אי עומד נפיש ניתר בעומד מרובה על הפרוץ ואי פרוץ נפיש נידון משום לחי

[was also allowed in it]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of course it is; the freedom of movement in the courtyard is not affected by such a gap.');"><sup>25</sup></span> Then how can one apply<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'wilt thou say'.');"><sup>26</sup></span> [the same ruling] to an alley where only a gap of four cubits<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'whose breach by four'.');"><sup>27</sup></span> [was allowed]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As in the case of an alley, the law was restricted in respect of the size of a gap so it might also have been restricted as regards permissibility of movement where the built portion is larger than the gap. How then (cf. supra note 14) could a law relating to an alley be inferred from one relating to a courtyard?');"><sup>28</sup></span>

Shev Shmat'ta

We hold that a safek isur Torah is asur, and the opinion of the Rambam in his great work [Mishneh Torah] in several places, is that this rule is only mid'rabanan, and that mid'oraisa all case of doubt are mutar. This is also the opinion of the Raavad. But the Ramban and the Rashba argue and they prove that when Chazal say "you must be stringent on a doubt of Torah prohibiton", that is mid'oraisa. And the Pri Chadash in Yoreh Deah elaborates on this. See there, section 110.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse