Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Musar for Niddah 45:63

מתקיים אמר רב ירמיה מדפתי

that it is viable! But did not Rab Judah citing Rab state: R. Meir gave his ruling<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That an abortion of a beast or wild animal is regarded as a valid birth. ');"><sup>51</sup></span> only because in the case of its own species<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Beast born from beast or wild animal from wild animal. ');"><sup>52</sup></span> it is viable?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' But not when a woman aborted such creatures. The question of wife's sisters, consequently, could never arise in such a case. What then was the point in R. Jeremiah's peculiar enquiry? ');"><sup>53</sup></span> Said R. Aha b. Jacob: 'To such an extent did R. Jeremiah try<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By his absurd enquiries. ');"><sup>54</sup></span> to make R. Zera laugh; but the latter did not laugh'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It is forbidden to indulge in laughter in this world (cf. Ber. 31a). ');"><sup>55</sup></span> [Reverting to] the [previous] text, 'Rab Judah citing Rab stated: R. Meir gave his ruling only because in the case of its own species it is viable.' Said R. Jeremiah of Difti:

Orchot Tzadikim

And a man should not rejoice to the point of hilarity for now all joy should be mixed with sobriety, for when our "Holy Rabbi" (Rabbi Judah the Prince) used to laugh thus, troubles came to the world (Berakoth 31a). And similarly "Rabbi Jeremiah would bring Rabbi Zera to the point of laughter, but Rabbi Zera did not laugh" (Niddah 23a).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse