Musar for Sanhedrin 47:6
גופא אמר ר"ל פה קדוש יאמר דבר זה תני עדו
one master [Rabin]accepts the reasoning of <i>Miggo</i>; while the other [R. Dimi] rejectsit.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The dispute is whether this reasoning is acceptable in general, though in the actual case under discussion there may possibly be no difference. Thus, Rabin holds that miggo is generally accepted, and here too, whilst R. Dimi rejects this reasoning here and elsewhere; therefore, it is only because R. Meir maintains that a litigant must substantiate his whole statement that his opponent is able to disqualify his witnesses, as explained above, and this is irrespective of whether the judges have been proved incompetent or not. ');"><sup>5</sup></span>