Reference for Chullin 170:31

א"ל

Is R'Simeon of the opinion that unconsecrated [animals slaughtered] in the Temple Court are [forbidden] Biblically?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This appears to be R. Simeon's view from the foregoing argument. For if he were to hold that an unconsecrated animal slaughtered in the Sanctuary may be eaten according to Biblical law, but was forbidden by Rabbinic enactment because of the apprehension that people, seeing one eat the flesh of such an animal outside the Sanctuary, might be misled in believing that one may eat consecrated meat outside the Sanctuary - then there is no valid reason to differentiate (v. supra) between the slaughtering that renders the animal fit for food and the one that does not');">⁸</span>

Jastrow

Jastrow