Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Reference for Pesachim 87:14

והאי משרת להכי הוא דאתא האי מיבעי ליה לכדתניא משרת

and eats it, it does not contain as much as an olive within the time of eating half [a loaf]. He raised all objection against him: If there are two [stew] pots, one of hullin and the other of terumah, and in front of them are two mortars, one containing [condiments of] hullin and the other containing terumah, and the latter fell into the former, they are permitted,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The pot of hullin is permitted to a lay Israelite.');"><sup>17</sup></span> for I assume: the terumah fell into the terumah, and the hullin fell into the hullin. Now if you say that as much as an olive within the [time of] eating half [a loaf] is a Biblical [standard],why do we say, 'for I assume, the terumah' etc.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For of course it might have been the reverse; how then can we make this lenient assumption when there is a doubt of a Scriptural prohibition?');"><sup>18</sup></span> ? - Leave the terumah of condiments alone, he replied, which is [only] Rabbinical.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By Scriptural law no terumah is required for these; hence the entire prohibition in this case is only Rabbinical.');"><sup>19</sup></span> He raised an objection against him: [If there are] two baskets, one containing hullin and the other containing terumah, and in front of them are two se'ah [of provisions], one of hullin and the other of terumah and these fell into those, they are permitted, for I assume: the hullin fell into hullin, [and] the terumah fell into the terumah. Now if you say that as much as an olive within the eating of half [a loaf] is a Scriptural [standard], why do we say, 'because I assume' [etc.]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. n. 6.');"><sup>20</sup></span> - Leave the terumah [set aside] kutah there is as much as an olive of leaven, and for that he should be liable. at the present time<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' After the destruction of the Temple.');"><sup>21</sup></span> he answered him, which is only Rabbinical. Now does this [law of] the infusion [of grapes] come for this purpose?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Supra ');"><sup>22</sup></span> It is required for what was taught: 'An infusion':

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse