Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Reference for Temurah 32:19

שהקדושה חלה על בעלת מום קבוע ואין יוצא לחולין

Then it is proved from here that we form an analogy between the cases not explicitly stated<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A sin-offering whose owners procured atonement and whose year had passed.');"><sup>17</sup></span> and the cases explicitly stated: Just as in the cases explicitly stated the sin-offering is brought by an individual and not by a congregation, so in the cases not explicitly stated the sin-offering is brought by an individual and not by a congregation.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This then is the reason for R. Simeon's opinion. The Rabbis however hold that four cases of sin-offerings were imparted from Sinai to be left to die. Therefore wherever we find that a sin-offering applies to an individual and a congregation, then it applies, and where not, it does not apply.');"><sup>18</sup></span> <big><b>MISHNAH: </b></big>IN SOME WAYS [THE LAW RELATING TO] DEDICATIONS CARRIES GREATER WEIGHT THAN [THAT RELATING TO] EXCHANGE, AND IN SOME WAYS [THAT RELATING TO] EXCHANGE CARRIES GREATER WEIGHT THAN [THAT RELATING TO] DEDICATIONS. IN SOME WAYS [THE LAW RELATING TO] DEDICATIONS CARRIES GREATER WEIGHT THAN [THAT RELATING TO] EXCHANGE, FOR DEDICATED ANIMALS CAN EFFECT EXCHANGE WHEREAS ONE SUBSTITUTED CANNOT EFFECT EXCHANGE.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that if one says concerning an animal consecrated through being a substitute that it should in turn confer holiness on another animal by means of exchange, a further exchange does not take place.');"><sup>19</sup></span> A CONGREGATION OR PARTNERS CAN DEDICATE BUT CANNOT EFFECT EXCHANGE. WE CAN DEDICATE EMBRYOS AND LIMBS,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This is the view of R. Judah (supra 10a) .');"><sup>20</sup></span> BUT WE CANNOT EFFECT EXCHANGE WITH THEM. [THE LAW RELATING TO] EXCHANGE CARRIES GREATER WEIGHT THAN [THAT RELATING TO] DEDICATIONS, SINCE EXCHANGE<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So with Sh. Mek.');"><sup>21</sup></span> HAS EFFECT ON A PERMANENTLY BLEMISHED ANIMAL<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that if one substitutes a blemished animal for an unblemished dedicated animal, holiness attaches to the former to the extent that it does not become hullin.');"><sup>22</sup></span> AND IT DOES NOT BECOME HULLIN

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jastrow

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse