Related for Yoma 110:4
כי אתא רב דימי אמר אמרי במערבא גזירה משום חטאת שמתו בעליה ומי חיישינן והתנן השולח חטאתו ממדינת הים מקריבין אותה בחזקת שהוא קיים
This is the view of R'Judah.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Shek VI, 6; for notes v. Sonc. ed. a.l. Hence R. Judah apparently did consider inscriptions of value.');"><sup>2</sup></span> - When R'Dimi came [from Palestine] he said: In the West<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Palestine.');"><sup>3</sup></span> they said: It is a preventive measure against the case of a sin-offering whose owner has died.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A sin-offering, the owner of which died, must not be sacrificed but must be left to die, v. supra 50a. Now if the owner died, then the money for the value of the sin-offering which he may have put in one of the chests must be thrown into the sea. That money, being unusable and confused with other monies in the chest, would render them all useless. This is the confusion referred to above, hence the non-provision of money chests for obligatory offerings of a bird.');"><sup>4</sup></span> But do we indeed take that into consideration?