Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Responsa for Chullin 230:11

(דברים יד, ב) כי עם קדוש אתה לה' ונאמר להלן

and it is written there: There shall be no consecrated prostitutes of the sons of Israel;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ibid. XXIII, 18. Heb. The analogy is drawn by reason of the similar expression used in both passages, , and .');"><sup>6</sup></span>

Teshuvot Maharam

Q. (1) A made a contract with B and gave him a pledge as security that he would fulfill the contract and said, "If I do not carry out the terms of the contract the pledge shall be yours."
(2) C went surety for A to B promising to pay him a certain amount if A should break the terms of the contract.*That two questions were asked of R. Meir, one regarding security, and another regarding a surety, is seen from the fact that towards the end of this Responsum (in the Pr. 130 version which deals with a pledge) R. Meir uses the phrase וכ׳׳ש ערב לא משתעבד מק׳׳ו המשכון עצמו פטור כ׳׳ש הערב, which seems to indicate that the question was also about a surety. Furthermore, Responsum Cr. 34, gives exactly the same answer as Pr. 130, regarding a surety. Do such transactions fall under the rule of asmakta (אסמכתא)?
A. Both cases fall under the rule of asmakta and are, therefore, not binding.
SOURCES: Cr. 34, Pr. 130; L. 356; Asher, Responsa 108, 27.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse