Responsa for Niddah 116:3
שאני התם דאיכא סלע יתירה
the law is different since there was an additional <i>sela'</i>.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which cannot possibly be attributed to the bird. As the stain of one woman at least must be an unclean one, and since it cannot be ascertained which one it is, uncleanness must be imposed on both women. In the former case, however, where one woman examined the shirt and the other did not, uncleanness may well be imposed on the latter only. ');"><sup>3</sup></span>
Teshuvot Maharam
Q. A community summoned A to court and ordered that he answer the summons before a specified date, which date was extended to the first day of the (next) month, or be guilty of transgressing against a [community], solemn decree. Is the first day of the month included in the period given A to answer the summons of the community?
A. The community is entitled to consider the period given to A to answer its summons, as extending only up to, but not including, the first day of the month.
SOURCES: Pr. 825.
A. The community is entitled to consider the period given to A to answer its summons, as extending only up to, but not including, the first day of the month.
SOURCES: Pr. 825.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy