Responsa for Yevamot 67:10
בשלמא כולהו משכחת להו דשוינהו שליח ושוו אינהו שליח ופגע שליח בשליח אלא נדות היכי משכחת לה
— Surely, in relation to this it was stated that R. Bibi b. Abaye said: We are here speaking of <i>terumah</i><span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Containing 'leaven' or any other hamez. ');"><sup>26</sup></span> on the Eve of Passover when time is pressing.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' After a certain hour on that day all hamez, would have to be burnt. ');"><sup>27</sup></span> If you prefer I might say: [Our Mishnah speaks] of simultaneous prohibitions, and may represent even the View of R. Simeon.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who agrees with R. Meir that simultaneous prohibitions do rank as equal in force, and both may be imposed. ');"><sup>28</sup></span>
Teshuvot Maharam
A. The Huppah ceremony is the marriage proper for a maiden, while the essential marital act for the widow who remarries is cohabitation. Therefore, a person marrying a widow must consummate the marriage before sunset (on Friday) lest he first cohabit with her on the Sabbath and thus perform an act of possession on the Sabbath.
SOURCES: L. 151.