Talmud for Eruvin 139:1
ליגזר דילמא אתי לבטולי להו קמ"ל:
that this<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The presentation of their shares by two tenants to one.');"><sup>1</sup></span> should be forbidden, as a preventive measure against the possible assumption that one may also renounce his share in favour of two,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'he might come to renounce for them'.');"><sup>2</sup></span> hence we were informed that no such possibility need be considered. BUT MAY NOT ACQUIRE ANY. What need was there for this ruling?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which is virtually a repetition of the previous ruling. 'TWO ... IMPOSE RESTRICTIONS UPON ONE ANOTHER'.');"><sup>3</sup></span>
Jerusalem Talmud Eruvin
It was stated60Tosephta 5:17, Babli 70a.: “One who did not make an eruv cedes his rights to two who did make an eruv but two who made an eruv do not61In the Babylonian sources (Note 60) “do cede”. This text seems to be required. cede to one who did not make an eruv. And two who made an eruv may not cede to two who made no eruv62Since two who made no eruv prohibit the use of the courtyard to one another, cession of rights by other inhabitants is ineffective.. Also two who made no eruv may not cede to two who made no eruv. Everybody may cede his rights and accept rights except two who made no eruv who may cede rights but may not receive62Since two who made no eruv prohibit the use of the courtyard to one another, cession of rights by other inhabitants is ineffective..”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy