ח ואסור להעלות [וכו']: אמר רב יוסף שמע מינה בשר עוף בחלב דאורייתא דאי סלקא דעתך דרבנן אכילה גופה גזירה ואנן נגזר העלאה אטו אכילה
8 AND IT IS ALSO FORBIDDEN TO PLACE etc. R'Joseph said: You can infer from this that the flesh of fowl [cooked] in milk is prohibited by the law of the Torah, for were it only [prohibited by the enactment] of the Rabbis, seeing that the actual eating thereof is [prohibited only as] a precautionary measure, would we forbid the placing [of them together upon the table] as a safeguard against the eating thereof?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This would be imposing a precautionary measure (sc. restriction of placing them together on the table) upon a precautionary measure (sc. the restriction of eating fowls cooked in milk) which is not done.');"><sup>10</sup></span> And whence do you derive the rule that we do not impose a precautionary measure upon a precautionary measure? - From the following [Mishnah] which we have learnt:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hal. IV, 8.');"><sup>11</sup></span> The dough-offering<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. Num. XV, 20; Of the first of your dough you shall offer up a cake for a heave-offering. This law only applied to Palestine, i.e., to dough made from produce grown in the land of Israel (cf. ibid. 18) , but the Rabbis ordained that it be observed outside Palestine, i.e., in respect of dough made from produce grown outside the Land of Israel, as a precautionary measure safeguarding the dough-offering of Palestinian produce. If, therefore, a non-priest ate the dough-offering offered from produce grown outside the Land of Israel he has transgressed a Rabbinic enactment');"><sup>12</sup></span>