Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Sukkah 36

CommentaryAudioShareBookmark
1

אמרינן פי תקרה יורד וסותם רבא אמר פסולה לא אמרינן פי תקרה יורד וסותם

we say that the edge of the roof [of the exedra is regarded as though it] descends and fills up [the space]. While Raba says it is invalid, since we do not say that the edge of the roof descends and fills up [the space].

ResourcesAsk RabbiCopyNotesHighlightBookmarkSharePlay
2

אמר ליה רבא לאביי לדידך דאמרת פי תקרה יורד וסותם אפילו הפחית דופן אמצעי אמר ליה מודינא לך בההיא דהוה ליה כמבוי המפולש

Rava said to Abaye: according to you who say that the edge of the roof [is regarded as though it] descends and fills in [the space, is a sukkah valid] even if the middle wall is missing? .He answered him, In that case I agree with you [that the Sukkah is invalid] since it would be like an alley-way that is open on two opposite sides.

ResourcesAsk RabbiCopyNotesHighlightBookmarkSharePlay
3

לימא אביי ורבא בפלוגתא דרב ושמואל קמיפלגי דאתמר אכסדרה בבקעה רב אמר מותר לטלטל בכולו דאמרינן פי תקרה יורד וסותם ושמואל אמר אין מטלטלין בה אלא בד' אמות דלא אמרינן פי תקרה יורד וסותם

Shall we say that Abaye and Rava disagree on the same principle as that on which Rav and Shmuel differed for it was stated: If an exedra was in a field: Rav declares that it is permitted to carry [on Shabbat] over the whole extent of it, since we say that the edge of the roof descends and fills in the space; While Samuel said that it is forbidden to carry in it except within four cubits, since we do not say that the edge of the roof descends and fills in [the space]?

ResourcesAsk RabbiCopyNotesHighlightBookmarkSharePlay
4

אליבא דשמואל כ"ע לא פליגי

No!] With regard to the opinion of Shmuel neither of them disagrees

ResourcesAsk RabbiCopyNotesHighlightBookmarkSharePlay
Previous ChapterNext Chapter