Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Kiddushin 96:13

אמר אביי ר"ש ורשב"ג ור"א כולהו סבירא להו מראה מקום הוא לו ר"ש הא דאמרן רשב"ג דתנן

- But, said Raba, I and a lion of our company, viz. , R'Hiyya B'Abin, explained it, What are the circumstances here? If she said to her agent, 'Go forth and accept kiddushin on my behalf from So-and-so, who has proposed to me, "Be thou betrothed unto me with a silver denar"'; and went and was given a gold denar. One Master holds [she was] particular [about this]; the other, that she indicated the place to him. And what is [the meaning of] 'IT IS FOUND'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For here too it was thus given at the very outset.');"><sup>16</sup></span> It was wrapped up in a cloth.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And it was discovered to be gold only upon reaching the woman's hand.');"><sup>17</sup></span> Abaye said: R'Simeon,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., b. Yohai.');"><sup>18</sup></span> R'Simeon B'Gamaliel, and R'Eleazar, all hold that one merely indicates the place.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In circumstances similar to the above.');"><sup>19</sup></span> R'Simeon, as stated. R'Simeon B'Gamaliel:' for we learnt:

Daf Shevui to Kiddushin

The first tanna who holds that one was merely indicating a place was R. Shimon from yesterday’s source about kiddushin.
The second source is about divorce documents, and it deals with the difference between plain gets, whose witnesses sign inside the document, and tied gets, whose witnesses sign on the outside of the document, after it has been tied. The tannaim dispute whether a get can be valid if signed in the wrong way. The Talmud will now discuss the various opinions in this source.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse